Why a standard, and why open?
AI answers are probabilistic: the same question asked twice can name different brands. Without a shared measurement discipline, every GEO claim is unfalsifiable marketing. We publish this framework openly — definitions, formulas, prompt-set design and scoring — so clients, competitors and researchers can apply it, challenge it, and improve it. An open standard is also a bet: if the industry measures AI visibility our way, this encyclopedia becomes the reference every engine cites. That is GEO, demonstrated on ourselves.
The four dimensions
Visibility
Appearance rate: across a graded prompt set for your category, how often does each engine name your brand? Scored 0–100 per engine.
Citation Rate
Credit quality: when engines answer about you or your category, which URLs do they cite, and what authority tier are those sources?
Semantic Coverage
Question-space completeness: what share of your category's full buyer-question matrix can engines answer with you in it?
Brand Cognition
Accuracy and sentiment: is what AI says about you correct, current and favorable — and consistent across engines?
How the composite works
Each dimension is measured per engine against the same prompt set, then aggregated with published weights (Visibility 35%, Citation Rate 25%, Semantic Coverage 25%, Brand Cognition 15%). The full prompt-set design rules, grading rubric and cadence recommendations are in the measurement methodology chapter. The GEO Checker runs a lightweight version of this framework free.