How to use this checklist

Work top to bottom and mark each item pass or fail — no partial credit, because every item is binary-verifiable with evidence you can screenshot. The four groups are ordered by dependency: technical access gates everything, content makes access worthwhile, sources make content believable, and measurement tells you whether any of it worked. Method details for each group live in the GEO Wiki; the scoring philosophy follows the open measurement standard.

Group 1: Technical access (14)

#Check
1Google Search Console verified; sitemap submitted; no mass exclusions of canonical pages
2Bing Webmaster Tools verified; brand and category pages confirmed indexed
3IndexNow connected; page updates push automatically
4robots.txt allows OAI-SearchBot and ChatGPT-User
5robots.txt allows PerplexityBot
6GPTBot, ClaudeBot and other training bots configured deliberately — not by accident in either direction
7Google-Extended decision documented (remember: training only, no effect on AI Overviews)
8Key content server-rendered; no JavaScript dependency for answer-bearing passages
9Organization, Article and FAQPage schema deployed and matching visible content
10Product/Offer/Review schema on commerce pages; prices as text, not images
11llms.txt published and synchronized with the real page set
12Server logs segmented by AI user agents; fetch frequency reviewed monthly
13Core pages interactive within 3 seconds on mobile
14No staging, faceted or parameter URLs wasting AI crawl budget

Group 2: Content engineering (14)

#Check
15Every core page opens with a bolded 40-80 word answer block
16H2/H3 headings are real buyer questions
17Key categories have comparison tables with an honest “who this suits” column
18Every core page carries 2-4 genuine FAQs with matching FAQPage schema
19Every statistic states source and date
20Prices, specs and certifications exist as text, never only as images or PDFs
21Publish and update dates agree across meta, schema and visible page
22Target-market content is native-quality, not machine translation
23Quarterly refresh ritual exists for top citation pages
24Paragraphs are self-contained: one claim, fully stated, quotable out of context
25Fan-out sub-questions for the main topics are mapped and covered
26No keyword-stuffed legacy pages surviving on authority alone
27Author entities real and consistent: names, bios, credentials
28Contact, company and policy pages complete — trust surfaces engines can verify

Group 3: Source graph (12)

#Check
2920-30 real buyer questions tested; the domains engines actually cite are listed
30Every industry directory on that list is claimed and consistent
31Review-platform profiles (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot or category equivalents) claimed and complete
32Compliant review invitation flow running: no gating, no incentives
33Every review answered, including negative ones
34Genuine expert participation on Reddit, Quora or vertical forums under real names with disclosure
35Trade media or podcast appearances on record for the current year
36Brand facts — founding date, address, description — byte-identical across site, directories and socials
37Organization schema carries alternateName and a complete sameAs set
38Wikipedia/Wikidata handled honestly: present if genuinely notable, otherwise secondary anchors (Crunchbase etc.)
39No purchased spam directories or low-quality link packages in the backlink profile
40Local businesses: Google Business Profile complete plus NAP audit across all citations

Group 4: Measurement discipline (10)

#Check
41A fixed question set of 50-100 buyer questions is frozen, sourced from real customer language
42The set is organized by decision cluster: shortlist, compare, verify, price, risk
43The set runs on a fixed date each month, per engine, never averaged across engines
44Every answer screenshotted and archived with date, engine and question ID
45Four-dimension scores — Visibility, Citation Rate, Semantic Coverage, Brand Perception — recorded monthly, 0-100
46Hallucinations and factual errors logged separately and tracked to source-side fixes
47Attribution notes link content and source-graph actions to score changes
48Vendor or agency acceptance criteria written only as re-verifiable terms: baseline-to-retest deltas
49Every new cycle structured as a 90-day POC: baseline, intervention, re-measurement
50Zero-click economics (Ahrefs, February 2026: −58% position-1 CTR with AI Overviews, ~68% zero-click) understood by whoever reads the report

How do you score and prioritize?

Score each group against its item count: technical out of 14, content out of 14, sources out of 12, measurement out of 10. Any group under 60% is next quarter’s priority. Typical sequences: technical gaps close in two weeks; content and source-graph groups take a quarter each; measurement starts this month because every other group is blind without it. Then re-run the whole checklist quarterly as part of the quarterly GEO audit, and validate the result against your live scores in the GEO checker.

Frequently asked questions

How long does it take to pass all 50 checks?
Technical items close in about two weeks, entity and profile fixes in two to four weeks, and content plus source-graph groups take a quarter or more. Full conformance is a 6-12 month asset-building program, not a sprint.
Can I use this checklist to evaluate an agency?
Yes — that is a design goal. Ask the agency to deliver evidence per item: screenshots, profile links, deployment records. Any item they cannot evidence is a risk point in the engagement.
Which group should I start with?
Measurement, paradoxically: it takes a day to freeze a question set and run a baseline, and every other group’s progress is invisible without it. Then technical access, because crawler blocks gate everything downstream.